This indicates the transformation of expenditures in advertisment and shows us companies actually spend more money on the Internet and cable TV rather than magazines, newspapers, and radio. This is a reflection of how people actually spend time daily becuase companies want to reach more people rather than where and who watch their commercials. However, not only that, the Internet also substitue for everything in a efficient and convenient way. We can read magazines and newspapers on the Internet as well as we can watch movies, TV channels, and even more on the Internet. Because the Internet also meet with particular segments and they like to introduce the advertising to friends, companies spend more money on the Internet advertising. The Internet is very productive, but much cheaper or cost less for reproduction.
I spend usually 7 hours on the Internet daily. I do not know how many ads I am exposed to everyday, but I think it is a lot. I have seen P&G that has been working on the Internet advertising such as video clips, bloggers, websites, the Internet magazines and social network sites etc.... The gap between traditional media and new media will increase in terms of advertising expenditures as time goes by because of the generation change and a new generation is becoming more dependant on the Internet. I also wonder how a smart phone's roles will evolve to the next level of technology and will affect other media devices.

I think your prediction that the gap in advertising expenditures between traditional media and new media will increase is very intriguing. There is a redistribution of funds when it comes to media selection for advertising, and they definitely reflect society's preferences and usage of various media. Advertising is becoming even more pervasive, and I can absolutely see ads on mobile phones as the next step. (You can even rent out your forehead as advertising space, though I'm sure that's more of a fad than anything substantial).
ReplyDelete